🔗 Share this article

Initially, Donald Trump appeared to take a resolute approach regarding the Ukrainian conflict. Following issuing threats of "severe ramifications" in August if Putin carried on blocking truce discussions, the former president ultimately imposed major penalties on the Russian two largest petroleum corporations, these major energy companies. This move significantly affected the Russian leader's capability to support his war effort in Ukraine.

However, through his latest comprehensive peace initiative for Ukraine, reportedly developed by US and Russian officials lacking Ukrainian or European participation, he has apparently gone back to his Russia-friendly position.

Benefiting Invasion

The former president's plan would in practice reward Putin for attacking a sovereign nation while leaving Ukraine's democratic system in jeopardy. Despite bold declarations that "The nation's independence will be upheld", significant aspects of the plan actually undermine that same independence. Seen as a Moscow's wish would likely be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his corporate background, the former president continues to treat the Ukrainian conflict as a mere land disagreement, like ceding Putin a section of Ukrainian soil will satisfy the ruler. Yet, Putin's war is not simply about occupying a charred area of economically weakened land in eastern Ukraine. Rather, it is about the nation's political system – and Putin's obvious goal to weaken it so it no longer acts as an attractive standard for the Russian citizens of the accountable governance that his deepening dictatorship prevents them.

Land Giveaways

While freezing in status the already divided oblasts of these areas, the initiative would force the nation to give up all of Donetsk region. In addition to benefiting Russia with area that its forces have been failed to capture in exceeding a lengthy period of warfare, this giveaway would make Ukrainian defensive positions dangerously compromised.

Donetsk is the location of Ukraine's highly-touted "stronghold system", the fortified defensive positions that constitute a essential impediment to enemy progress. The proposal would have Ukraine abandon these defenses, providing Putin a clear route to Kyiv in case he subsequently decide to resume the hostilities.

Armed Forces Reductions

Then, in a move that would make renewed hostilities simpler for the Russian military, the plan would force Ukraine to diminish the size of its troops from their existing 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a limit of 600,000. Importantly, Trump's proposal sets no similar limits on the invading army.

Apparently as a concession to Putin's attempts to characterize Ukraine's chosen by the people administration as radicals, Trump's proposal asserts: "Every extremist doctrine and activities must be rejected and banned." Seemingly to highlight this element, it insists that "The nation will hold elections in 100 days" of a peace deal. However, the proposal places no condition that Putin endanger his regime by conducting elections in his own country.

Protection Commitments

To be sure, the proposal includes Russia pledge not to "attack bordering nations" and to "establish in legislation its position of non-aggression towards Europe and Ukraine". But given that Putin has breached equivalent accords in the history – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government pledged to recognize the nation's borders in return for giving up its former Soviet nuclear weapons, and the previous peace deals, in which Moscow committed to a truce and a return of seized territory in the Donbas to Kyiv – why should anyone believe Putin on this occasion?

This explains Ukraine has been so determined on western defense commitments. Although the plan warns of a "immediate coordinated armed reaction" if Russia renew its aggression, and provides that "The nation will receive reliable defense commitments", the specifics range from vague to troubling. The proposal would not only deny Ukraine Nato membership but also prevent Nato members from stationing forces on Ukrainian territory, effectively precluding the reassurance force, likely commanded by the UK and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been depending to stop Russia from restoring his weakened military, re-equipping, and attacking again.

Global Concern

Another supplementary accord according to sources would grant the nation with a Nato-style defense commitment, in which any later "serious, deliberate, and ongoing aggression" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "shall be regarded as an act of war threatening the tranquility of the allied countries." This implies a military response. Yet unlike a powerful Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's primary deterrent against additional hostilities – the success of the side agreement would depend on the willingness of alliance members, such as the US administration, to act with force to Russia's aggression, something they have {not